Sarah Palinites
The other day, Facebook informed me that I had seven friends who “liked” Sarah Palin. Naturally, I first checked to see who they were (no surprises there) and then I posted this:
Marlene Merritt is slightly alarmed to see FB say that seven of my friends “like” Sarah Palin. Does this mean they “like” her as a personality? or as someone making important political decisions? Because those are two VERY DIFFERENT THINGS.
I got 21 comments and I think someone unfriended me ;-) But I was serious — those ARE two very disparate things, and I’m completely unclear as to into which camp my friends fall. Because if they’re thinking she’s good with international policy (remember the “I can practically see Russia from my house” comment?) or that basically she’s good at anything except relating to people, I WILL SERIOUSLY QUESTION THE NUMBER OF BRAIN CELLS THEY HAVE.

Remember this? Oh, there were so many pictures of Palin disasters to choose from!
Of course, one of my friends who likes her AND has a brain, jumped to the conclusion that I was criticizing other people’s point of view (what else is the First Amendment for? just kidding) and wrote:
But you clearly comment on seven of your friends “liking” her and proceed to question how and why they could possibly like her, which is a different thing entirely. It comes off a bit like an ideological “purity test.” Are you really committed to having your friends not be able to have a political viewpoint different than yours without feeling that you will call them out over it? Is your friendship and good opinion of someone dependent on their political beliefs?
Wow. That’s an awful lot to get out of a short FB post — where exactly did he get all that? And what happened to the days when people could have a political discussion? Is that what it has devolved into nowadays? That if you even mention that you might possibly not agree with someone’s opinion, that’s “calling them out” on it? I remember my dad (total Republican) and a family friend (who had emigrated from East Germany and was a staunch Communist) getting into at dinner parties, but they were still friends at the end of the evening. These days, you risk entire relationships if you mention you might not agree with them politically.
All I was checking on was to see where my friends were coming from (alas, only one replied — the one who wrote that comment. Although you could probably count the one who unfriended me <smirk>) — do they like her because she’s a hot MILF? Do they find her easily relatable? Or do they think she’d make a great president? (Really? Please say not. Please.) It’s the thinking I’m more interested in — I know people who vote a certain way because their parents always have, and not because they’re actually doing their own thinking (like my gay UPS driver, when she decided to vote for the first time at the age of 47 in the last election. Her small-town Texan mom’s choices might not be the same ones she’d want ;-) Just a guess. )
I know less than the fingers on one hand, people who think politically differently than me with whom I can have a civil conversation about politics. By “less”, I mean 2-3. By “conversation”, I mean some back-and-forth where we can actually agree on some things, and disagree on others, and there’s actual thinking and reflection involved, and not knee-jerk “I’ve always voted _________” or “The _________s are driving this country into the ground” generalized responses.
Ugh, this is making me feel old.




